* Image: Pixabay
Click to read the article in Turkish
In a joint statement, 24 genocide scholars have released a joint statement on climate change noting that a fundamental paradigm shift in the way they approach their disciplinary field is necessary.
The human rights defenders and academics, including Prof. Taner Akçam from Clark University, shared their statement with the press on Yom HaShoah, namely on the Holocaust Remembrance Day.
In their statement regarding climate change that represents an urgent paradigm shift in their field, the signatories of the statement have proposed a fundamental change to their cornerstone mentalities.
In sharing the statement with the public, it is said:
"Genocide scholarship examines why one group of people seeks the annihilation of another group of people.
"And its practitioners have tried to understand how to prevent mass atrocities. Drawing on certain ethical norms, experts on genocide urge the adoption of moral standards that aim to create a better society.
"Until now, devastating man-made crises such as pandemics and environmental disasters were mostly left to the domain of the natural sciences. This is precisely what needs to change.
"Consequences from these human induced catastrophes have the potential to imperil not only Earth's ecosystems but also all living species.
"Moreover, they disproportionately impact marginalized communities and the eventual cost to human life could be on an unforeseen scale.
"To that end, these issues must immediately move to the center of genocide studies entailing major revisions to university curricula, research priorities, and scholarly discourse."
Some highlights from the scholars' statement are as follows:
"As genocide scholars, we need to rethink what we study and why, not just with a view to the horrors of the past but the interconnections between that past and present, and why these interconnections matter to our fate as a global society, not to say species.
"Above all we need to ask why climate change, as with the pandemic, is impacting 'first and worst' on the most exposed and vulnerable, on people of color, primarily in the global south, on the rural as well as urban poor, on subsistence, nomadic and pastoralist societies, the dispossessed and displaced from war zones but also indigenous peoples, otherwise First Nations, everywhere.
"Those in particular who in the past have suffered and continue to suffer in terms of health, mortality and quotidian violence the most searing toxic and polluting effects of fossil fuel and mining extraction, or otherwise the systemic degradation, dispossession, displacement and psychic numbing which comes with the structural violence inherent in a world where principles of social as ecological justice do not carry to those who most need them, are today aptly named as frontline communities.
"Yet the study of genocide in its legitimate concern to identify perpetrators has, to date, only rarely included in its roll call those most responsible for the ongoing structural as well as ecocidal violence visited upon such communities. The field's primary focus on a range of totalitarian, fascistic and authoritarian social formations and their state actors has not been wrong.
"But in effectively reading genocide as some extraordinary aberration from a dominant, liberal, supposedly rules-based norm, it has elided the systemic, embedded violence which is at that liberal order's own heart.
"The fact that rarely, or at least insufficiently have we chosen to interrogate trans-national corporate businesses, or their lead players as perpetrators, may be a function, in significant if possibly sub-conscious part, of the way all of us in wealthy societies are compromised through the benefits we derive as consumers from these corporates.
"But if that requires us to acknowledge our own complicity, it certainly does not and cannot provide an excuse, as students of mass violence, to sit on our hands.
"Equally, as teachers in the classroom, we cannot shirk responsibility from saying it as it is. We do not need to be environmental experts to tell the truth about the peril we face as a human community, nor to flinch from acting as role models in our efforts to educate and mobilize our students to act as if that truth were real.
"It is normative – implicitly if not explicitly – in genocide studies to encourage students to empathize, even identify with the victims of mass violence, and often to pay further attention to those who have acted as resisters and rescuers. The same surely should be true of what we might encourage of and enthuse to our students in the contemporary now.
"As a human community, we can from this point onwards carry on, oblivious to the damage which our national and corporate-led systems are doing on the road to hell and perdition. Alternatively, we can repent our complicity and set ourselves instead on a different path towards healing between humans and other humans, and between humans and the natural world upon which our sustenance and species-sustainability depends.
"Genocide scholars cannot be exempt from this challenge. On the contrary, we have a signal role in it."
(PT/SD)