Local court rejects appeal of Enis Berberoğlu

Click to read the article in Turkish

The İstanbul 14th Heavy Penal Court has rejected the appeal of Enis Berberoğlu against its ruling that "there is no ground for retrial."

After the Constitutional Court ruled that Berberoğlu's right to be elected and engage in political activities and his right to personal liberty and security had been violated, the file was sent back to the heavy penal court for retrial so that the consequences of the right violation could be eliminated.

Announcing its ruling on October 13, the court defied the decision of the top court and concluded that "there was no need for retrial." The attorneys of Berberoğlu lodged an appeal and requested that the ruling be revoked.

Having convened today (October 15), the İstanbul 14th Heavy Penal Court has rejected the appeal. Concluding that "there is no ground for retrial," the court has sent the file to the upper court, the 15th Heavy Penal Court.

In their petition to the court, Berberoğlu's attorneys requested a priority review and the implementation of the Constitutional provisions.

CLICK - Local court defies Constitutional Court ruling of right violation for Enis Berberoğlu

CLICK - Constitutional Court: Rights of Enis Berberoğlu violated

What happened?

Over a news report on "MİT Trucks" published on Cumhuriyet newspaper, Enis Berberoğlu was sentenced to 25 years in prison on charge of "disclosing information that has to remain confidential for the security of the state or domestic or foreign political interests for purposes of political and military espionage." Following this ruling handed down by the İstanbul 14th Heavy Penal Court, Berberoğlu was arrested on June 14, 2017.

The ruling of the local court was reversed by the 2nd Penal Chamber of the İstanbul Regional Court of Justice, the court of appeals, on October 9, 2017. In its related ruling, the court of appeals noted that "the elements of the crime 'disclosing confidential information for purposes of espionage' would not arise if it was admitted that the secret had been disclosed before."

However, the İstanbul 14th Court of First Instance found this ruling of reversal contrary to both due procedure and the law and returned it.

Reexamining the file, the court of appeals ruled that Berberoğlu should be sentenced to 5 years, 10 months in prison, but this time not for "espionage," but for "disclosing information that has to remain confidential for the security of the state or domestic or foreign political interests." With this ruling, the court also ruled that Berberoğlu should remain behind bars.

The Public Prosecutor of the İstanbul Regional Court of Justice appealed against this ruling. Requesting that Berberoğlu be penalized on charge of "espionage," the prosecutor sent this request to the Court of Cassation.

The petition demanded that Enis Berberoğlu, who was still behind bars at the time, be penalized on charge of "disclosing information that has to remain confidential for the security of the state or domestic or foreign political interests for purposes of political or military espionage."

After Enis Berberoğlu was reelected as an MP from the main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) on June 24 General Elections in 2018, he applied to the Court of Cassation and requested the stay of the execution of his prison sentence. This request was rejected on July 20.

However, on September 20, 2018, the Court of Cassation accepted the request of stay of execution on the grounds of Berberoğlu's legislative immunity and ruled that he should be released.

The finalized ruling on Berberoğlu was read out at the General Assembly of the Parliament on June 4, 2020 and he was stripped of MP status. He was detained and arrested the next day. On the same day, he was released from prison as part of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) measures.

On September 17, 2020, the General Assembly of the Constitutional Court examined the application of Enis Berberoğlu and concluded that his right to be elected and engage in political activities and right to personal liberty and security had been violated. Around a month later, on October 13, the local court defied this decision and concluded that there was no ground for retrial. (HA/SD)