Five journalists acquitted in 'trustee protests' case in Mardin

The journalists after being released from detention. (Photo: Ahmet Kanbal)

Click to read the article in Turkish / Kurdish

A court has acquitted five journalists of violating the Law on Gatherings and Demonstrations in a case concerning the protests against the dismissal of the mayor of the southeastern Mardin province.

Mesopotamia Agency (MA) reporters Ahmet Kanbal and Mehmet Şah Oruç, JinNews reporter Rojda Aydın and freelance journalists Nurcan Yalçın and Halime Parlak had been detained while following the protests in 2019.

Apart from the journalists, the Mardin 1st Penal Court of First Instance also acquitted three other defendants of violating Law No. 2911 in today's (October 20) hearing.

CLICK - Protests Against Trustees: MPs Hospitalized, Journalists Detained

"We are journalists"

Submitting their opinion at the hearing, the prosecutor stated that the defendants should be acquitted.

Kanbal said that police prevented them from doing their jobs by the police and the prosecutor's opinion should be in line with this.

In his defense statement, Kanbal's attorney Erdal Kuzu noted that they had previously submitted the documents proving that their clients were journalists to the court.

The belongings found on their clients during their detention proved that they were journalists, the attorney said.

"Appointment of a civil servant to replace an elected mayor is news anywhere in the world. As journalists, our clients followed the demonstration where the appointment of a trustee to the municipality was protested. We demand their acquittal," he said.

The attorney of Parlak and Yalçın, Resul Temur, said, "Our clients were detained while they were doing journalism. They did not do any criminal acts. For this reason, we demand the acquittal of our clients in line with the [prosecutor's] opinion."

Attorneys of the other defendants also requested an acquittal.

Announcing its verdict, the court acquitted all defendants on the grounds that there was no definitive and convincing evidence that they had committed the charged offense.

(HA/VK)