Ex-deputy to pay moral compensation to military firm

Hüda Kaya, who the court sentenced to pay a fine of 35.000 lira to SADAT for "attacking personal rights" in relation to a parliamentary question she submitted, cites legislative immunity and says that such a decision should not exist in a state of law.

Ruken Tuncel

Ex-deputy to pay moral compensation to military firm

Click to read the article in Turkish

SADAT (International Defense Consultancy Construction Industry and Trade Inc.) has won a moral compensation lawsuit it filed based on the question submitted to the Parliament by former HDP MP Hüda Kaya, seeking a response from then-Vice President Fuat Oktay.

The court sentenced Kaya to pay a fine of 35,000 lira, claiming that she had "attacked personal rights" of SADAT.

Commenting on the decision, Kaya stated, "They are trying to intimidate me through the law, and I do not accept this. I stand by my statements and the parliamentary question I submitted regarding SADAT."

"Such a decision shouldn't exist in a state of law"

Reminding that Article 83 of the Constitution provides legislative immunity for members of parliament, Kaya said, "A member of parliament is legally protected in relation to their speeches, parliamentary questions. Targeting my legislative duties, going to court and obtaining such a decision is not something that should happen in a state of law."

"Response came not from the Parliament but from the court"

Kaya recalled that she had submitted the parliamentary question after the killing of Deniz Poyraz at the HDP building in Izmir by an armed attacker. She stated, "After Deniz Poyraz's murder, some photos were published, and allegations related to SADAT's involvement were raised. As a member of parliament, I made statements about these allegations.

"Later, following extensive research on SADAT, I, as an MP submitted a parliamentary question requesting a response from Fuat Oktay. However, instead of a response from the Parliament or the presidential palace, I am being reprimanded through the legal system. This is not something that can happen in a state of law. SADAT should not have the legal right to take such action. I stand by my words; all these allegations will come to light in a more democratic and transparent rule of law."

Kaya also mentioned that they have not yet received official notification of the decision and stated that they will appeal the ruling.

Kaya's Parliamentary Question

The questions for which the court sentenced Kaya to compensation are as follows:

1. Are there any public institutions that collaborate with SADAT Inc. or receive consultancy services from its employees? If so, which ones are they?
2. How often and by which authorities/agencies is SADAT Inc. audited?
3. Do the Turkish Armed Forces, National Intelligence Organization, and General Directorate of Security conduct any work with SADAT Inc.? If they do, what is the content and purpose of these activities?
4. Where has SADAT Inc. conducted training camps or activities within the country so far? Is the number of people trained in these places known? In which institutions and in which regions are these individuals employed later?
5. As stated on the SADAT Inc. website, the company conducts training, consultancy, and equipment activities in various countries. How many people have received training in these countries? Where are these trained personnel assigned?
6. Are there any military training camps run by SADAT Inc. inside or outside the country? If so, where are these camps, who receive training there, and how often are they inspected? Where are these trained individuals employed?
7. Has any investigation been launched regarding the allegations that SADAT supplied arms to Sultan Murad Brigades and Al-Nusra terrorist organizations and trained militants for them?
8. Do individuals affiliated with SADAT Inc. have any involvement in the events where soldiers and military students were killed on July 15 attempted coup, as well as in similar incidents?
9. What is the role of SADAT Inc. at the Kabul Airport in Afghanistan?
10. Were the groups that attacked us while we were visiting the tension-filled environment in Silvan on November 12, 2015, and wore vests with the words "Esedullah" and "Cundullah," mostly gray-haired, bearded, and acted independently, shouting takbirs, and attacking us with real bullets, affiliated with SADAT?
11. Is there any connection between SADAT and the individuals who attempted to burn villagers with gasoline in Lice during the same period?
12. Was Statutory Decree No. 696 issued, which allows individuals who supported the government during the coup attempt, even committing crimes including murder, during both the coup attempt and similar events, which is known as the "internal civil war Statutory Decree," issued specifically for SADAT members?
13. In 2017, a change was made in the Regulation on the Application of the Law on Private Security Services, allowing the carrying of long-barreled firearms by private security personnel. Is this change related to SADAT and its affiliated security companies?
14. Does SADAT, or its related organization, ASSAM, have the power to place individuals in the army and make the desired arrangements, as stated by Adnan Tanrıverdi's statement, "After the coup attempt, we made the changes in the army that we wanted"?
15. Has SADAT established a partnership with Albayrak company in Libya, participating in training activities and providing training for UAVs and UCAVs?

SADAT Previously Filed a Lawsuit Against Kılıçdaroğlu

CHP Chairman Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu visited the SADAT Headquarters in Beylikdüzü on May 13, 2022, and made a statement there.

Kılıçdaroğlu had said, "I would like everyone to know this, the CHP will make every effort for the election to take place in this country through democratic means. Organizations like SADAT, no matter who they are, if there is anything that will overshadow the election, disrupt the security of the election, the responsibility stands here and in the palace. I am expressing this to our entire nation."

SADAT had filed a 1 million lira compensation lawsuit against Kılıçdaroğlu due to these statements. In the court hearing held on April 28, 2023, the court had ruled for Kılıçdaroğlu to pay 30,000 lira in compensation.

About SADAT

What is SADAT: International Defense Consultancy Construction Industry and Trade Inc., or SADAT Inc., is a Turkey-based military consultancy company founded by retired Brigadier General Adnan Tanrıverdi on February 28, 2012.

The company's stated mission is to provide strategic consultancy, internal security, and military training as well as equipment services to the Armed Forces and Internal Security Forces, thereby contributing to the creation of a defense and defense industry cooperation environment among Islamic countries and helping the Islamic world take its rightful place among the world's superpowers.

What it does: SADAT claims to offer services in the international arena, including military and internal training, defense consultancy, and arms procurement.

Noteworthy among the courses offered by the company are titles such as "Unconventional Warfare (Counter-Guerrilla)" and "Sniper Training." Training packages include topics like "Land Operation," "Sniper Training," "Protection," "Destruction," "Unconventional Warfare," "Advanced Combatant Combat," "Artillery and Forward Observer," and "Tank / Armored Vehicle Hunting."

SADAT Inc. has a sister organization called ASSAM, which has a more political focus. ASSAM operates as a strategic research center.

Who is involved: The company employs between 50 and 200 retired Turkish Armed Forces personnel from various branches and areas of expertise.

Allegations about SADAT: İYİ Party Chairperson Meral Akşener raised the issue of the establishment of armed training camps in Konya and Tokat by SADAT and called for an investigation.

SADAT, which Akşener pointed out and demanded preventive measures, had been in the spotlight in the past for opening extensive training camps in various places, where it was claimed that 2,800 people received "unconventional warfare" or "guerrilla" training.

SADAT had also come under scrutiny for allegedly providing support to the Free Syrian Army during the Afrin operation in 2018 and for taking to the streets during the coup attempt in 2016, engaging in clashes with soldiers. Additionally, it had been widely discussed that the statutory decree granting judicial immunity to civilians during the coup attempt was issued for SADAT.

(RT/PE)

Origin

BIA News Desk

Ruken Tuncel

[email protected]

all articles of the author

bianet eğitim ve mülteci hakları editörü. Evrensel, T24, Taraf, Bakurpress, JİNHA, Jin news, Özgürlükçü Demokrasi ve Yeni Yaşam gazetesinde, yargı muhabirliği, politika editörlüğü, hak ihlalleri ve kadın alanlarında çalıştı. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi İnternet Gazeteciliği ve Yayıncılığı, Marmara Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Gazetecilik bölümünde okudu.