Calling a man an animal is a compliment for the man and an insult for the animal.
Because, in nature, there is no animal that inflicts violence on its female.
They say that artificial intelligence will dominate everything. Artificial intelligence would do everything but would not inflict violence on women.
Because violence against women has nothing to do with intelligence.
The invention of an artificial stupidity is needed for violence against women.
In human history, there is a single period when a human did not inflict violence on another human and, thus, a man on a woman. Some call it the era of hunters and gatherers, others name it primitive communal society...
This period was characterized by the absence of a concept of ownership. We can draw the following conclusion from this:
"Property is the basis of violence against women".
Our ancestors were matriarchal when they were on horseback. Woman was the power and man was only a supplement to it. We were nomads, we did not own any property.
There was no money, but barter...
It was when our ancestors dismounted from the horse... It was when they came to own property and issued money... Then, they pushed women into the background...
In other words, pushing women into the background when we find money and own property is something that we have inherited from our ancestors.
Let's spread the news to the ones who ask, "Why do men change their cars first and then their wives when they find money?"
And, now, let's turn to the gender-based discrimination... Let's first look at which female animals we have named differently... The male of a chicken is a rooster... The male of a sheep is a ram... The male of a cow is an ox... We called the female of a human woman-girl (child)...
However, we were not really interested in the sex of a sparrow, we just called it a sparrow... I mean, lion, come on, the enormous lion... The female is a lion (in Turkish) and the male one is a lion as well...
Why is that the case? Because capitalism attaches neither a special importance nor a special name to the gender that it cannot use or exploit... Capitalism is a male system.
In capitalism, violence against women is not about education, but about position. A man who sits in his chair at the coffeehouse on Sundays cannot inflict harassment or violence on a woman who sits in the chair of a director general in his workplace.
Can we imagine that a male employee, who works in the same workplace with businesspeople Güler Sabancı or Leyla Alaton, subjects them to mobbing, harassment or violence? No, we cannot.
Because, in capitalism, the limits of thought are determined by the chair where one sits. The ones who subject women to mobbing or harassment draw their strength from the chairs where they sit as much as masculinity. The magnitude of violence is directly proportional to the grandness of the title and wealth. The other way around is the exception.
We have called every name in the book about capitalism, but, were previous eras any different?
There are two absolute things that have been descending from father to son: One of them is kingdom... And the other one is dick.
That is why, the regime of kingdom is something like a dick...
Let's conclude with the lyrics of a song by folk singer Neşet Ertaş:
We men are the sons of humans. Because women are humans themselves.* (MCS/ŞA/APA/SD)
* In Turkish: Biz erkekler insanoğluyuz. Çünkü kadınlar insan.
Most Read Today
TRIAL OF ACADEMICS Prof. Dr. Gençay Gürsoy Sentenced to 2 Years, 3 Months in Prison 11 December 2018
HDP Announces the 'Judiciary Toll' 11 December 2018
Demirtaş: God Forbid, I Didn't End Up Outside 11 December 2018