
Last Modified 05-12-2008 14.25
News Tags
Related Bianet News
News
The Supreme Court of Appeals rejected Ağar’s case on the grounds that he was a governor at the time of the crime. Ağar has been under investigation for some time in the Susurluk conspiracy.
Bia news center - Ankara
10-07-2008
Supreme Court of Appeals reached the decision of lack of jurisdiction in the case of former president of the True Path Party (DYP) Mehmet Ağar, who was on trial for the crime of “forming an organization to commit crime” during the period when he was the head of the Police Department.
The 1st Chamber of the State Council had decided to try Mehmet Ağar, and State Council’s Administrative Works Committee had confirmed the decision by rejecting an objection against the case. However, the 8th chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals rejected the case by declaring lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that Ağar was a governor at the time of the crime. Therefore, the chamber sent Ağar’s file to Ankara’s High Criminal Court.
Inspection of Ağar’s involvement in Susurluk conspiracy began after his immunity was removed, but he could not be taken to the court since he was a deputy of the DYP for a while. He is seen as the main actor of the Susurluk conspiracy. The Susurluk case started with a traffic accident at Susurluk, a town near Balıkesir in Western Turkey, on November 3, 1996. The accident revealed connections between the Istanbul police, the nationalist Grey Wolves organisation, and politicians. (NZ/EZÖ/TB)
|
Home Page |
Documents | About Us |
Links
| Çocuk Sitesi | BİAMag |
Kadının Penceresi | News in English
This website is published within the framework of "Journalism for Rights, Rights for Journalists" -dubbed as BİA3 - project implemented by the IPS Communication Foundation with the financial assistance of the Swedish International development Agency (SIDA). International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) has also contributed to the website's upgrading costs. The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of IPS Communication Foundation and under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the EU and SIDA and IFEX. |